<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Coding Relic - Latest Comments in blog.8.11.2009 &amp;lt; /dev/random</title><link>http://codingrelic.disqus.com/</link><description>Random Musings about Software in an Embedded World</description><atom:link href="https://codingrelic.disqus.com/blog8112009_lt_devrandom/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:37:22 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: blog.8.11.2009 &amp;lt; /dev/random</title><link>http://codingrelic.geekhold.com/2009/08/blog8112009-devrandom.html#comment-14710031</link><description>&lt;p&gt;True. I also have no idea of the terms of the settlement. Generally SFLC demands the source be posted plus a monetary component to fund their operations. In bigger cases they've demanded a compliance officer be appointed and contact information be made public.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Its possible that Extreme went the extra mile to post all of the GPLd source, not just busybox. Their engineering management has been completely turned over since this all happened.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DGentry</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:37:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: blog.8.11.2009 &amp;lt; /dev/random</title><link>http://codingrelic.geekhold.com/2009/08/blog8112009-devrandom.html#comment-14707779</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This only covered busybox... thats okay though, I am sure they will just wait around until somebody asks for the source code to all the REST of the GPLed code they likely use which they aren't distributing...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Name</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:23:31 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>